Mathis Bondaz vs Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Nov at 08:46 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bondaz vs J. Vitor Goncalves Ceolin

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bondaz 1 - 0 Ceolin
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mathis Bondaz winning 2 and Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin winning 1. The last match between Mathis Bondaz and Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin was at the M25 Austin, 19-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mathis Bondaz getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bondaz | 1 |
| Ceolin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Austin(11-19-25)
M. Bondaz vs J. V. G. Ceolin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.76% (23-19) | Career Total W/L | 48.72% (57-60) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Bondaz vs J. V. G. Ceolin Match Preview:
- Second serve effectiveness: Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin holds an edge with a 41.88% win rate on second serve points, surpassing Mathis Bondaz's 39.08%. Which player’s second serve perform better? Joao's statistics give him a slight advantage in this area.
- Return game efficiency: Mathis Bondaz outshines Joao in first serve return points won, recording 32.96% compared to Joao’s 29.74%. Could this be a determining factor? For first serve returns, Mathis holds the advantage.
- Pressure resilience: Under pressure, Joao has saved 45.36% of breakpoints, narrowly edging Mathis, who has saved 44.88%. Does Joao handle pressure better? The difference is marginal, but it's in Joao's favor.
- Overall match success: Over the past year, Mathis boasts a 63.64% win rate, compared to Joao's 56.00%. Which player has had more victories recently? Mathis has been more successful overall.
- Surface proficiency: Joao's preferred surface is Clay with a 52% success rate, while Mathis performs best on Hard courts, also at 52%. Which surface benefits each player? Joao excels on clay, whereas Mathis thrives on hard courts.
- Player tournament level: Mathis has a higher success rate at Futures/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches, compared to Joao’s 58.33%. Who plays better at similar event levels? Mathis has the edge here.
- Quality of opposition: Joao has faced tougher competition, with his opponents holding an average rank of 365.58, while Mathis’s opponents average at 472.5. Who has battled stronger opposition? Joao has faced higher-ranked competitors.
- Deciding set performance: Joao has succeeded in 64% of deciding sets, slightly better than Mathis’s 60% success rate. Who performs better when matches are closely contested? Joao has the advantage in deciding sets.
- Break point conversion: Joao converts 34.33% of break points, while Mathis follows closely at 34.02%. Who is better at seizing opportunities? Joao has a slight edge in this aspect.
Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the players' performances, Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin shows marginally superior second serve performance and breakpoint resilience, setting a solid foundation for a competitive matchup. His proficiency on Clay and ability to navigate high-stress situations by winning deciding sets further bolster his chances.
Mathis Bondaz has delivered a more robust overall match win record in recent play, alongside excelling on Hard courts and in Futures/ITF tournaments. However, he is less tested against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting that Joao may handle more challenging adversaries more efficiently.
Both players display comparable skills in break points conversion and resilience under pressure, but Joao's ability to perform better in crucial moments might give him the upper hand.
Considering these factors, the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match is Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin.
Mathis Bondaz vs Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bondaz vs J. V. G. Ceolin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:41:49 | Average Match Time | 2:41:49 |
| 56% (43/77) | 1st Serve % | 68% (64/94) |
| 65% (28/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (41/64) |
| 44% (15/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (5/5) |
| 45% (42/94) | Return Points Win % | 44% (34/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Bondaz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(1) 6-7(6) 7-6(0) | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
J. V. G. Ceolin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(7) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||

M. Bondaz vs J. V. G. Ceolin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.76% (23/19) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.72% (57/60) |
| 52.69% (49/44) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.87% (130/136) |
| 52.19% (452/414) | Games Win/Loss | 49.64% (1251/1269) |
| 65.38% (17/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.38% (12/17) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.76% (44/41) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 43 | Aces Total | 121 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 96 | Total Double Faults | 230 |
| 1:19:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 417.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 273.81 |
| 60% (1179/1957) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2489/3926) |
| 60% (713/1179) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1546/2489) |
| 47% (368/778) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (642/1437) |
| 43% (111/257) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (162/415) |
| 44% (918/2108) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1541/3892) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 56.10% (23/18) | Futures W/L | 50.44% (57/56) |
| 54% (22/41) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (55/115) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 60% (6/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 87% (23/20) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (57/49) |
| 13% (23/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (57/8) |
| 11% (19/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (60/8) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
